Powered by Article Dashboard

Search:

Home | Aviation | Aviation Law


The Oil Spill - The Legal Perspective

By: Jon Linch

Unfortunately, when the term "The Oil Spill" is mentioned these days, we know all as well nicely what the phrase refers to. The oil spill within the Gulf of Mexico is most likely 1 of the gravest ecological disasters of our lifetime. Many people will suffer severe damages, such as the loss of their livelihoods. While some media sources, including the Orlando Sentinel, paint a picture that attorneys are “swarming to solicit clients to file suit,” within the wake from the BP oil spill, the truth from the matter is that individuals have already suffered severe injury, damage and loss. They will likely require legal representation to make sure their rights are protected.

It has now been more than 45 days since the explosion in the Gulf of Mexico triggered the enormous oil leak which continues to threaten our environment and economy. All efforts to control the spill have failed and it now appears the greatest hope to contain the leaking oil is the completion of a new oil rig and well that will hopefully allow the oil leak to become diverted towards the new rig. That potential solution may be as far as two much more months away.

The oil explosion which erupted on April 20, 2010 continues to emit 210,000 gallons of oil to the Gulf daily and has spilled over 9.5 millions gallons of oil into the Gulf waters.

According to some experts, the current spill will most likely be larger and much more difficult to contain than the Exxon Valdez spill of 1989, or the Santa Barbara spill of 1969 (www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/04/bp-could-face-billions-in_0_n_562271.html).
Approximately 11 million gallons of crude oil was released into the Prince William Sound within the Exxon Valdez spill, causing detrimental effects on the ecosystems and environment in Alaska. According towards the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, “the Exxon Valdez oil persists in the environment and in places,” and “is nearly as toxic as it was the first few weeks after the spill” (www.evostc.state.ak.us/recovery/status.cfm).
The Council goes on to state how the damage from the spill was so severe, than even after 20 years, you will find two species which have not recovered, ten species that are still recovering, and five species that are still uncertain of recovery. (www.evostc.state.ak.us/recovery/status.cfm).
It's too soon to know the extent of damage how the BP oil spill will have on the environment and economy. What we do know if that oil spill has currently claimed the lives of 11 workers who were presumed dead like a direct outcome from the explosion. We realize that various businesses, including commercial fishermen, charter boat-operators and other businesses linked to tourism have currently suffered a loss. We know that substantial damage to wild life is expected within the near future. We know that the oil spill has currently damaged numerous habitats. And we know that the spill has placed many animals and sea life in harm’s way.

You will find currently thousands of workers, such as fishermen, seafood workers, resort and motel owners within the Gulf which have started to seek compensation for the damages they have endured, particularly lost wages. Just like in individual injury claims (for instance, car accident injury claims) where the accident victim is seeking compensation for his/her lost wages, the victims from the oil spill should produce financial records of prior wages to illustrate how the explosion affected their income.

The complete price of containing the 210,000 gallons of oil that gush from the well, as well as the cost of cleaning up the spill is yet to be known. Not only will BP be accountable for such costs, but they will be responsible for paying for damages, such as reduction earnings, wages and economic suffering. How much cash could BP be accountable to pay? There's a Federal cap of $75 million that could limit what BP is accountable to pay in total damages for the damage brought on by the spill. for which BP could be held accountable. www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/04/bp-could-face-billions-in_0_n_562271.html). This cap is the outcome from the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. The Act states the total liability for an offshore facility shall not exceed $75 million. 23 U.S.C. 2702 Section 1004 (a)(3).

Fortunately, there may be an exception to this cap. The Act provides how the cap will not apply, and will probably be lifted, when the oil spill was triggered like a result of “gross negligence” or “willful misconduct,” or if the explosion was like a outcome of “the violation of an applicable Federal safety, construction, or operating regulation by, the responsible party, an agent or employee of the accountable party, or a individual acting pursuant to a contractual relationship with the responsible party.” 23 U.S.C. 2702 Section 1004 (c)(1)(A)(B).

As a result, if BP, or one of its agents, is found to have been grossly negligent, or if they are found to possess violated a federal security regulation, then BP may not be protected by the $75 million cap. IF they are found to have been grossly negligent, BP may need to pay for all the harm that the explosion triggered and will continue trigger in the future regardless from the price.

Nevertheless, the direct trigger of the explosion has yet to become uncovered, as the companies involved with this oil nicely continue to point the finger of blame at each other. The two main companies involved are B.P., and also the owner of the rig and equipment, Transocean. It will be interesting to see if these two entities fight it out or if they agree to cooperate in resolving the claims brought by this disaster.

In order to determine if BP was grossly negligent, and hence not able to seek the protection from the cap, there are lots of factors which might be evaluated. The past records from the businesses might be important. BP has had numerous mishaps recently. In 2005, a blast at a BP refinery in Texas took the lives of 15 individuals and injured 170 individuals. In 2006, BP had a pipeline leak, which dumped over 200,000 gallons of oil onto the Alaskan North Slope. And just recently, in October, BP was fined $87 million for failing to rectifying safety hazards in the Texas plant.

Again, the full extent of harm brought on by the explosion will not be recognized for some time. When the Exxon Valdez disaster is any indication of the extent of long term damages to expect, the damages caused by the BP explosion might have an effect on our environment and economy for generations to come. The potential long-term effects in conjunction with the amount of legal claims the victims will bring, promise that there won't be a speedy resolution of the legal matters. Unless, BP, and Transocean, do the correct thing and make fair and just compensation obtainable to the victims, the victims from the oil spill aren't most likely to see any monetary compensation for a long time.

Contact an Orlando personal injury lawyer these days!

Article Source: http://sports-articles.net

Mark A. Risi is an Orlando personal injury lawyer that also is an Orlando car accident lawyer based out of Winter Park, Florida.

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Aviation Law Articles Via RSS!